All paradoxesParadox

Grow fast, or grow on your own money?

Investor money buys speed. Your own money buys control.

2 ideas, 1 min

Strategy

Blitzscaling

Speed first, profit later.

Grow as fast as possible, even at a loss, to win a market before rivals arrive. Speed over efficiency, on purpose.

Right when
When the market goes to whoever gets biggest first, usually because of network effects, and second place gets very little.
For example
Ride-hailing apps spent heavily on discounts for riders and bonuses for drivers. More drivers meant shorter waits, which brought more riders. In each city, being second was worth far less than being first.
Wrong when
When there’s no winner-takes-most prize, and the losses just buy customers who leave when the discounts stop.
Every New User Makes It Better
Money

Bootstrapping

Grow only as fast as you earn.

Growing a business on its own earnings, with no outside investors. Slower, but every rupee is yours and nobody can rush you.

Right when
When customers pay from day one and growth doesn’t have to be a race. Every rupee earned is proof the business works.
For example
Zoho, the Chennai software company, has grown since 1996 without outside investors, and built a global business on its own earnings.
Wrong when
When a funded rival grabs the market while you’re still growing carefully.
Why do startups burn so much money?

What decides it

Does the biggest player take most of the market?

Speed is worth paying for only when size itself is the prize: network effects, scale, a market where the winner takes most. Everywhere else, growing on your own earnings is slower, cheaper and much harder to kill.

Was this useful?

Namaste, I’m Manas.

I’m a CS grad. Samanar is where I learn business out loud, one idea at a time. I’m not an expert yet. Writing it down clearly is how I get there.

Every article is a concept I had to understand first. I explain it the way I wish someone had explained it to me: short, plain, and with real examples.

The pixel guy on the logo? That’s me too.