All paradoxesParadox

Copy the winner, or stand apart?

Copying is cheap and proven. Standing out is how you avoid a price war.

2 ideas, 1 min

Strategy

Copy what works

Copy what’s already proven.

Many winners didn’t invent the idea. They copied one that was already proven and ran it better. Copying is cheaper than guessing.

Right when
When the idea is proven and the market is still growing, but the way it’s run can be done better: faster, closer, cheaper or better fitted to local buyers.
For example
Flipkart began in 2007 selling books online, an idea Amazon had already proven in America. The edge was fitting India, including cash on delivery for buyers who didn’t trust paying online.
Wrong when
When you copy so closely that customers can only compare you on price.
Marketing

Be different

Different beats better.

If you look like everyone else, buyers compare you on price alone. Standing out is how a brand escapes the race to the bottom.

Right when
When the market is crowded and every option looks the same. Being the obvious different choice beats being slightly better.
For example
Avis was second to Hertz in American car rentals. Instead of claiming to be the best, it said “We’re number two. We try harder.” Being second became the reason to pick it.
Wrong when
When the difference is one nobody cares about.
Own One Word

What decides it

Is the market still growing, or already crowded?

In a young, growing market there’s room for a better copy, and copying saves you the cost of guessing. In a crowded one, another copy is just another price war. That’s when different beats better.

Was this useful?

Namaste, I’m Manas.

I’m a CS grad. Samanar is where I learn business out loud, one idea at a time. I’m not an expert yet. Writing it down clearly is how I get there.

Every article is a concept I had to understand first. I explain it the way I wish someone had explained it to me: short, plain, and with real examples.

The pixel guy on the logo? That’s me too.